Top Page Shadow

Inn Ste Gemme 2

Inn Ste Gemme 3

Inn Ste Gemme 1

Ste Gevevieve Art Gallery 1

This country has a long romantic relationship with guns: frontier spirit, hunting, my home is my castle, stand your ground - on and on. They are part of many people's life-long tradition. Me, I ave no interest in guns. They exist mostly for the purpose of killing some being. Now, years ago I tried plunking some beer cans with a .22. I've tried shooting clay pigeons with a shotgun along with my brothers-in-law and nephews, all delightful people, on the old family farm in Kansas. (I can't hit a tree, let alone a moving target.) But there may be 75-80,000 people at this convention and Missouri allows anyone with a permit to carry a concealed hand gun. And Mitt Romney is in town today to speak to them. Too scary.

So, Mrs. C and I are heading out of town for the weekend to the picturesque village of
Ste. Genevieve, an hour down river. I think it was the first French settlement west of the Mississippi. Plus which, Saturday is our anniversary. (Number 38, thank you.) I think I'll put off more of the lady ruggers till next week. Today is the home opening game for the defending baseball champions, our St. Louis Cardinals. Your faithful blogger will be there with, um, several lenses. Pix of that on Saturday and Ste. Gen by Sunday.



 /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StLouisDailyPhotoBlog/~4/Sct8qLyPmEw" height="1" width="1"/> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/293284/title/More Voter Suppression in the Missouri Legislature">
			More Voter Suppression in the Missouri Legislature</a><br />
			04/17/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			<p>In the Missouri House yesterday, the House approved language sponsored by Republican Secretary of State candidate <strong>Shane Schoeller (R-Willard)</strong> for a constitutional amendment weaking our voting rights and making it increasingly difficult, if not impossible certain individuals, to vote.</p> <p>Of course, Schoeller couldn't disguise his excitement at the thought of disenfranchising hundreds of thousands, of his fellow citizens, <a href="http://votevets.org/news/releases?id=0491">11,000 of whom are active military voters</a>:</p> <p class="rteleft"><a href="https://twitter.com/#!/shaneschoeller/status/190200785001390080"><img alt="" class="noside" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7082/7071786155_ac93b51e23.jpg" style="width: 482px; height: 234px;" /></a></p> <p>A common sense proposal? Is that what he calls targeting voters who happen to be serving their country in the military?</p> <p>Check this out from the <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/columns/the-platform/editorial-latest-in-voting-hypocrisy-republicans-target-military-voters/article_10f28a57-f638-5784-9498-401790c46aa0.html#ixzz1rmUvj4Z3">Post-Dispatch</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><strong>No one in the Legislature is more committed to trampling on [the right to vote] than Rep. Shane Schoeller, the third-term Republican from Willard who is running for secretary of state.</strong></p> <p>Mr. Schoeller not only wants to ask voters to weaken the state constitution and then disenfranchise any state voters who lack a specific form of government-issued photo identification, <strong>now he also wants to <a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills121/biltxt/intro/HB2109I.htm">take away the right of absentee voters</a> — including members of the armed services — to mail in their ballots.</strong>[...]</p> <p>The worst provision in Mr. Schoeller's bill would take away the long-held right of Missourians who request absentee ballots to vote by mail. These folks already are registered to vote. Some of them are disabled and can't get to the polls. Others are members of the military, stationed far from home, perhaps even overseas protecting the very right to vote that Mr. Schoeller seeks to diminish.</p> <p>Why in the name of stubborn facts would Mr. Schoeller offer such a proposal? He told us that some of his constituents are concerned about potential voter fraud.</p> <p>"I don't have an example of this actually happening," he told us.</p> </blockquote> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> 	Schoeller and Missouri republicans actions against our fundamental right to vote, and especially since this legislation would make it virtually impossible for active duty military members overseas to vote prompted this response from VoteVets.org:</div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> <blockquote><p>Dear Representative Schoeller, </p> <p>One of the most important rights we have as Americans is the right to go to the polls and cast our ballots in favor of the people we want to represent us in our democracy. For over two hundred years, brave American men and women have raised their right hand and placed themselves in harm's way to defend this freedom. </p> <p>We wholeheartedly oppose your legislation (House Bill 2109) that would restrict the voting rights of troops who are deployed or stationed overseas, by limiting their ability to vote via absentee ballot. We feel that the idea that you would deliberately inhibit our service members from exercising the very freedoms they fight for is offensive, un-American, and wrong. </p> <p>Over 11,000 members of the military voted by absentee ballot in 2008.  Your legislation would end that right, and demand that members of the military find someone in Missouri to hand deliver their absentee ballot. </p> <p>This legislation is patently offensive to me and the millions who have served this nation in uniform, now and in the past.  It undermines the very cornerstone of our democracy and freedom.  On your website, you say you are dedicated to counting military votes.  If that is true, we ask that you prove it, by immediately pulling the bill from consideration.</p> <p>Sincerely,</p> <p>Jon Soltz<br /> 			Iraq War Veteran<br /> 			Chairman, VoteVets.org</p> </blockquote> <p>It's high time our legislature focused on the critical issues at hand such as our lack of revenue in the budget and creating jobs, not continuing their attack on our constitutionally protected right to vote.</p> </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> 	 </div> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/293285/title/Senate Wannabe Akin Talks Impeaching Obama">
			Senate Wannabe Akin Talks Impeaching Obama</a><br />
			04/17/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			<p><img alt="" class="rightside" src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2749/4078830300_d238b4f6e5.jpg" style="width: 285px; height: 215px;" /><a href="http://www.firedupmissouri.com/content/congresswoman-vicky-hatzler-birther">Unwilling to let other congresscritters from Missouri hog all of the national spotlight</a>, <strong>Rep. Todd Akin</strong> implied that he is in favor of impeaching <strong>President Obama</strong> even if the rest of the republican caucus isn't yet fully on board with the idea.</p> <p><a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/gop-congressman-we-cant-impeach-obama-because-we-dont-have-the-votes-yet.php?">From TPM:</a></p> <blockquote><p>Why hasn’t Congress impeached President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder? <strong>Rep. Todd Akin says it’s simply a lack of votes. But he says that may change eventually.</strong></p> <p><strong>“That’s a good question,” Akin told a constituent on Tuesday who asked just that. “I can’t speak for the other 400 and some congressmen, but I believe when they take a look at impeachment the question is do you have the votes to do it and, if you do it, it goes to the Senate, what’s going to happen with Harry Reid?”</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>Akin then went on a tirade against Obama, laying out what he sees as reasons supporting an impeachment of the president, even going so far to call Obama a "complete menace to our civilization."</p> <blockquote><p>Still, Akin said he had plenty of relevant concerns: <strong>Obama, he said, “ignores the Constitution, he ignores the laws, he wants to impose all of the czars, he completely ignores the train wreck of the economy, which he’s causing with trillion-dollar-plus deficits every year you go along.”</strong></p> <p>He concluded the quicker way to remove Obama from office would be to wait for the election to run its course.</p> <p><strong>“He is a complete menace to our civilization,” </strong>he said. “The question is what’s the best way to get rid of him, I think probably at the ballot box next election, we need to get that done.”</p> </blockquote> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/293283/title/BREAKING: Signing a Petition is Now a Crime, Some Say">
			BREAKING: Signing a Petition is Now a Crime, Some Say</a><br />
			04/17/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			<p>The <a href="http://www.firedupmissouri.com/node/15261">out-of-state bankers trying to protect their triple digit interest rates</a> are moving their<a href="http://www.firedupmissouri.com/content/out-state-bankers-dont-want-you-sign-their-bunk-petitions-after-all"> "decline to sign" campaign from the TVs</a> to the streets. Check out the SUV hauling the biggest clipboard of ever. This was spotted today in downtown St. Louis, a few blocks away from the Cardinals home opener rally.</p> <p>What will they come up with next?</p> <p class="rteleft"><img alt="" class="noside" src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5191/6928215018_d9ddb9ce26.jpg" style="width: 386px; height: 386px;" /></p> <p>In case you can't see it on your screen, it reads:<br /> 	<strong>BEWARE<br /> 	Don't Commit A Crime.<br /> 	Think Before<br /> 	You Sign That...<br /> 	INITIATIVE PETITION.</strong></p> <p>	I can't tell if its supposed to be a poem, or a haiku, or what.</p> <p>The takeaway from this photo? The bankers really, REALLY don't want you to <a href="http://firedupmissouri.com/content/out-state-bankers-think-they-will-fool-show-me-states-voters-two-bunk-initiatives">sign their bunk petitions</a>.</p> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/293281/title/Brian Nieves Would Have You Believe Our Laws are Under ATTACK">
			Brian Nieves Would Have You Believe Our Laws are Under ATTACK</a><br />
			04/17/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=366895223353997&id=830523218"><strong><img alt="" class="rightside" src="http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4134/4850448005_4886032844_m.jpg" style="width: 240px; height: 167px;" />State Sen. Brian Nieves (R-Attack)</strong> has a message for you</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Friends, Fellow Citizens, Patriots, and all who care about the future of this Great Republic!! My "Missouri Civil Liberties Defense Act" is under attack!! I don't mind when my bills are fought against with Truth but SB676 is being lied about because those who oppose it know full and well that NOBODY will stand with them IF the Truth is told. The Senators who are Fillibustering the bill are out & out Lying and as you'll see in this short video, those who oppose it are using deception to support their position! Tell your Senator to help pass this bill and do what you can to get Senators Chappelle-Nadal and Justus to stop the Bare Faced, Out-n-Out LIES about this bill.</p> </blockquote> <p>Unfortunately for Nieves, the bill he views as under attack is truly a waste of time and an attack on our constitution.  In short, <a href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/12info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=258830">SB 676 would prohibit foreign laws from being used in Missouri and American courts</a>. But guess what? The US constitution already has a prohibition on the usage of foreign laws in American courts.  Not only that, but <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/islamophobia.html">the legislation pushed by Nieves and his cohorts in other states such as Oklahoma, Tennessee, Florida, Louisiana, and Arizona are really just a nationally coordinated Islamaphobic attack</a>.</p> <p>Additionally, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/01/10/401693/oklahoma-sharia-ban-unconstitutional/">this sort of legislation has <em>already been found to be unconstitutional</em> in Oklahoma</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Appellants do not identify any actual problem the challenged amendment seeks to solve. Indeed, they admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing that <strong>they did not know of even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied Sharia law or used the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, let alone that such applications or uses had resulted in concrete problems in Oklahoma.</strong> See Awad, 754 F. Supp. 2d at 1308; Aplt. App. Vol. 1 at 67-68.</p> <p>Given the lack of evidence of any concrete problem, any harm Appellants seek to remedy with the proposed amendment is speculative at best and cannot support a compelling interest.15 “To sacrifice First Amendment protections for so speculative a gain is not warranted . . . .” Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Democratic Nat’l Co., 412 U.S. 94, 127 (1973).</p> </blockquote> <p>Instead of attacking the sensibilities of Missourians and wasting valuable time in Jefferson City pursuing unconstitutional legislation, Senator Nieves would be better served in focusing on the real issues at hand such as turning our economy around and creating jobs.</p> <!--break--><!--break--> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/293279/title/Blunt Sides with the 1%. Again.">
			Blunt Sides with the 1%. Again.</a><br />
			04/17/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			<p>Earlier today, the Senate voted on the Buffett Rule which would have ensured that the ultra-rich in our country pay their fair share.  Named for billionaire investor Warren Buffett who, because of the tax policies enacted under the previous administration, pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, the Buffett Rule would only affect one in 500 Americans and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/22/450000/conservatives-buffett-meager-revenue/">raise over $47 billion in revenue</a> which could be used for investment in our country's crumbling infrastructure by building roads and bridges and putting firefighters, teachers, nurses and other critical public servants back on the job.</p> <p>But how did <strong>Sen. Roy Blunt</strong> (R-MO) vote? With the 1% of course, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/04/16/465461/senate-republicans-filibuster-buffett-rule/">allowing senate republicans to filibuster</a> a piece of legislation that is supported by a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-polls-americans-divided-over-taxes-but-support-buffett-rule-20120416,0,433493.story">whopping 72% of Americans</a>.</p> <p>Shame.</p> <p class="rtecenter"> 	<img alt="" class="noside" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7115/7085767549_28a962baef.jpg" style="width: 500px; height: 380px;" /></p> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/290781/title/Another Form Of Organized Violence">
			Another Form Of Organized Violence</a><br />
			04/11/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			.<br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobcrowe/7065303717/" title="WomenWomen's Rugby 2

Just after leaving the gentle combat we've seen the last two days, I rounded a turn in Forest Park and found this. Since I was feeling, I parked at the edge of the field, put the big telephoto on my camera and just shot through the open window. Easy.

I did not know there was organized women's rugby. I've known a few men who play the sport. They usually put stickers on the backs of their cars that say things like "Give Blood - Play Rugby." Oh, and drink large quantities of beer, too.

Can't say what these women do after the match but they were fierce out on the pitch. The top photo looks like the blue team's sprinter is making a dash for the goal but is about to get flattened by a much bigger opponent.

It's been said that men should get more in touch with their feminine side. Evidently, the opposite is also true.

Might post some more of this on Friday but I've got some new Arch stuff for tomorrow.

Women's Rugby 3
 /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StLouisDailyPhotoBlog/~4/72wuHfjSgFw" height="1" width="1"/> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/290783/title/Hors De Combat">
			Hors De Combat</a><br />
			04/11/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			.<br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobcrowe/6913045440/" title="Foam Combat 1 by bobcrowe_com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7230/6913045440_1feed77482_z.jpg" alt="Foam Combat 1" height="437" width="640" /></a><br /><br /><div style="text-align: left;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family:arial;">While doing my weekend photo trawling around town I saw a group of people, some in quasi-medieval dress, some it tee shirts and shorts, in pitched battle on the make-believe Runnymede of Forest Park. <i>Had</i> to stop and say hello.</span><br  style="font-family:arial;"><br  style="font-family:arial;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family:arial;">This is the </span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://www.blogger.com/home.earthlink.net/%7Emikhoc/">Realm of Arnor</a><span style="font-family:arial;">, according to Mike Hockaday, the organizer. ItBelegarth, a "medieval combat society" inspired by the works of J. R. R. Tolkien: role playing, fantasy and good outdoor exercise with foam-covered swords and cudgels. What a great idea. There are lots of times I'd like to whap the bejeezus out of certain people with foam (or other) weaponry. More tomorrow. And pray, my lord, smiteth not the photographer!

Two days in a row with non-English post captions. Am I putting on airs?

Foam Combat 2
 /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StLouisDailyPhotoBlog/~4/1gb6dswQ8qw" height="1" width="1"/> <P> <br>
			<hr WIDTH="70%" alIGN="LEFT">
		</p></div>
		

		<h3 ALIGN="LEFT"><a href="http://www.newquestcity.com/forums/templates/threads.cfm/category/S26/thread/290784/title/Expecto Resurrectionem Mortuorum">
			Expecto Resurrectionem Mortuorum</a><br />
			04/11/2012<br /> 
		</h3><div align="LEFT">	
		<p align="left"  style="font-size: 100%; font-family:arial">
			.<br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobcrowe/6908886560/" title="Carrie We Love U by bobcrowe_com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5279/6908886560_174c008feb_z.jpg" alt="Carrie We Love U" height="437" width="640" /></a><br /><br /><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family:arial;">This spot  is on my way home from work almost every day. It

It looks pretty new although it memorializes an event more than two years ago. Not at all a lonely, secluded spot. The sentiment brought back up at this late date could make you cry. I thought it would be a good post for today. Jesus was murdered. The chance of new life for him or for Carrie is a question, gentle reader, that I leave up to you.